Welcome to the

Spectrum for Life Lab

S4L Mission

The S4L Lab’s mission is focused on supporting Autistic Flourishing through several different areas of research. S4L is investigating how the huge combination of strengths and co-occurring conditions make up multiple autism(s). We are investigating the different ways that autism(s) present in adulthood. We are also investigating how different factors (financial, social, health, sensory, etc) help or prevent autistic flourishing.

About the S4L Lab

S4L is a collaborative research lab that partners with other researchers and students interested in autism(s). The S4L Lab embraces the neurodiversity paradigm with a strong belief that all people have valuable traits and characteristics. Research in the S4L Lab strives to include Autists with all aspects of the research process including identifying the research questions and research design, assisting with recruitment, data analysis, and dissemination, and providing consultation for on-going research.

Types of Research Conducted Through Spectrum for Life

Survey Studies

Survey Studies help us better understand the characteristics, experiences, perceptions, and beliefs of Autists. Research in the S4L Lab is specifically focused on better understanding individual differences, or subgroups, within autism(s). Identifying ways that Autists are different from, or similar to, each other can help us design better services, programs, and therapies that can be tailored to individual needs.

Validating Measures

While many validated measures exist in the general population, few measures have been validated with Autists. Validated measures are required to measure change, such as improvements that are due to use of a service, program, or intervention.

Unifying Theory of Autism

Framework for Evaluating Autism Theories (FEAT). Autism is highly heritable. However, the specific mechanisms that underlie autistic phenotypes (traits), heterogeneity (variation), or prevalence increases are not well understood. While multiple theories exist, these theories vary in their explanatory power to account for autistic phenomena. We developed a framework to evaluate theories in the following domains: traits associated with diagnostic criteria/challenges and autistic strengths; heterogeneity in autism; mechanism overlap in non-autistic populations; and co-occurring conditions (health and wellbeing).

Developing Measures

Not all measures are suitable for use with Autists. For example, measures of social satisfaction might not account for the variety of ways that Autists prefer to structure their social lives. A measure of social relationships that views marriage and multiple friendships as an ideal might not be a good match for social outcomes for many Autists. Some people may actually prefer to be alone, while others might desire only platonic friendships. Measures for Autists need to be able to account for differences in what Autists value.

Autism Identity

Adapting and Developing Evidence-Based Interventions

Effective interventions exist for a range of concerns for the general population. However many interventions need to be developed or adapted to better serve Autists who may face barriers accessing these interventions. These barriers can be social or communicative, but they can also be due to challenges in transportation and other access concerns. Additionally, Autists vary greatly in terms of how they best learn information or find motivation for change. Adapting evidenced-based-interventions provides Autists with options that are tailored more closely with their individual needs. Two examples of interventions that need adapting are described below:

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Insomnia (CBT-i): CBT-i is an effective intervention for insomnia in the general population. However, CBT-i needs to be adapted to help clinicians better support Autistic Adults.

Systematic and Scoping Reviews

While much of autism research historically focuses on childhood, much less research investigates topic important for autism in adulthood. Systematic and scoping reviews organize and describe research on specific topics while highlighting gaps and issues within the literature. Our work covers interventions for autistic adolescents (), bully victimization, and controversies regarding applied behavioral analysis (ABA).

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.